03 March, 2018

How SA could Aggressively Expand its Economic Output !




According to the World Bank and as outlined in the chart above, in 1990 the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the Republic of South Africa (SA) was US$116 Bn as compared to that of the People’s Republic of China (China) which was US$ 361 Bn. Move forward twenty-five years to 2015 and South Africa’s GDP had grown by 175% to US$ 318 Bn while that of China had, over the same period, expanded by a staggering 2966% to just over US$ 11 Tn. This means that in 1990, China’s GDP (where GDP is defined as a measure of a country’s economic output) was three times larger than that of South Africa and over a period of twenty-five years China’s economy had grown to become more than 35 times larger than that of South Africa’s.

Economic success requires intelligent planning

How is it that China, a communist and a one-party state, could achieve such aggressive economic growth output? In my opinion, the answer lies in how the ruling Communist Party of China (CPC) drives the country’s economic and social development through its five-year plans. The period 2016-2020 marks the implementation of China’s 13th five-year plan. China’s five year-plans provide a strategic outline of the CPC government’s economic and social priorities, supported by enabling policies. Each five-year plan is a result of extensive consultation by the CPC with various stakeholders within the country.

These plans include focus areas by economic sector, coupled with concrete measurable targets and often the time frames for the achievement of the targets outlives the five-year period itself. However, during each five-year term, focused effort is given to the identified priority sectors. The five-year plans, once approved, their implementation is spearheaded by China’s head of state, the President with strong support from the head of government, the Prime Minister.

It is these plans and how they are implemented and monitored that has positioned China as a leading global player in areas such as manufacturing, information communications technology, ship-building, among others. Therefore, the five-year planning culture within the CPC is what has driven the fast rate of expansion of the economy of China.  

As pointed out, China is a one-party state where power is concentrated in the hands of the CPC therefore, the state and government in China are effectively one and the same and this in itself may have played and may continue to play a significant role in the effectiveness of China’s public sector. This is unlike in multi-party states where it could be argued that opposition party-politics tends to negatively impact the effectiveness of government and organs of state. Since 2002 Ethiopia has been emulating China’s five-year planning model. The year 2018 will market the start of the implementation of the country’s fourth five-year plan (for the period 2018-2022), a result of this is that Ethiopia’s economy has seen high rates of growth for the years associated with the implementation of its five-year plans. 

It is my opinion that lack of strategic prioritisation has resulted in what can only be regarded as lacklustre economic growth in South Africa over the past twenty-five years, both in absolute terms as well as relative to a country like China. To be sure, South Africa has made attempts to have a coordinated economic and social development strategy as outlined in the National Development Plan (NDP). However, the NPD is by enlarge gathering dust and for those elements of the NDP that are being implemented such implementation is uncoordinated.

How can SA accelerate economic growth?

In order for the NDP to succeed and for SA therefore to experience higher rates of economic growth in the future, the Presidency needs to decree the NDP as the country’s strategy. The first step towards effecting that decree would be for SA’s State President to deliver the State of the Nation Address (SONA) that is specific about SA’s strategic priorities in the medium to long term, guided by the NPD. The second step would be for the Minister of Finance to present in his/her Budget Speech to Parliament a budget which seeks to support the implementation of the strategic priorities. The final step would be for the Department of Planning, Evaluation and Monitoring (DPEM), working closely with the National Planning Commission (NPC), to be at the center of coordinating the implementation of the strategic priorities and evaluating performance against the set targets on an on-going basis. It would place great significance on the NDP if at each SONA, the President would provide feedback on the performance by government as a whole and all organs of the sate against set goals for each priority area and the same should be the case for the Minister of Finance when he/she delivers the Budget Speech. All of this ought to be underpinned by coordinated policy development across all levels of government and among all organs of the state.

There is no doubt therefore, that one of the ingredients for a high rate of economic expansion for a country is a clear strategy that is implemented in a coordinated manner and spearheaded by the head of state and government, and in the case of South Africa that would be the President who is both head of state and head of government.

Our Politicians must show political will to create effective government !!!